Product-Manager-Skills

왜 쓰나요

핵심 기능

47 PM skills across components, interactive flows, and multi-day workflows
Covers strategy, discovery, prioritization, PRDs, positioning, pricing, roadmapping
Interactive skills ask adaptive questions before recommending frameworks
Director and VP/CPO readiness coaching flows
Pedagogic SKILL.md structure: purpose → key concepts → application → pitfalls

라이브 데모

실제 사용 모습

product-manager-skill.replay ▶ 준비됨

0/0

설치

작성자 저장소 · Claude Skills 공식 문서

사용 사례

실전 활용법: Product-Manager-Skills

Run a customer discovery session without leading the witness

👤 PMs scoping a new feature area ⏱ ~60 min intermediate

언제 쓸까: You have customer calls scheduled and want a question set that actually tests assumptions.

흐름

Start the discovery interactive skill

Use the customer-discovery skill. We're exploring expansion into SMB for our enterprise invoicing tool.✓ 복사됨

→ Claude asks about target segment, hypotheses, and constraints before recommending
Get the interview script

Generate a 45-minute interview guide — warm-up, problem, context, workarounds, willingness-to-pay.✓ 복사됨

→ JTBD-style script, no leading questions
Synthesize after calls

Here are my notes from 6 calls. Synthesize themes and invalidated assumptions.✓ 복사됨

→ Pattern recognition grounded in notes, not wish-thinking

결과: Discovery notes your team can actually debate.

함정

Synthesis becomes confirmation bias — Ask Claude to explicitly list what was invalidated, not just validated

Draft a PRD that survives engineering review

👤 PMs writing specs for eng to build ⏱ ~45 min intermediate

언제 쓸까: Feature is scoped; you need a crisp doc the team can commit to.

흐름

Use the PRD component skill

Use the prd skill. Feature: bulk-edit for our admin panel. Here's what we know [paste context].✓ 복사됨

→ Structured PRD with user stories, success metrics, non-goals
Pressure test

What would a skeptical staff engineer push back on?✓ 복사됨

→ Specific gaps in edge cases, data model, non-functional requirements

결과: A PRD that makes it through eng review without a rewrite.

함정

PRD is framework-perfect but lifeless — Include real customer quotes in the context

함께 쓰기: linear · notion

Pick the right prioritization framework for the decision at hand

👤 PMs facing a roadmap tradeoff ⏱ ~30 min intermediate

언제 쓸까: The team is debating what to build next and 'just rank the backlog' isn't working.

흐름

Describe the decision

Use the prioritization-advisor skill. We're choosing between 3 bets: expand TAM, fix churn hotspot, ship a must-have for our largest deal.✓ 복사됨

→ Skill recommends a specific framework (RICE/ICE/Kano/cost-of-delay) based on the situation
Apply it

Walk us through scoring each bet with that framework.✓ 복사됨

→ Applied scores with reasoning

결과: A defensible prioritization call, not a thought-exercise.

함정

Score the framework picks without team buy-in — Run the scoring live in a team session, not solo

조합

다른 MCP와 조합해 10배 효율

product-manager-skill + linear

Draft a PRD then push the stories into Linear as epics

Turn this PRD's user stories into Linear issues under epic 'Bulk Admin Edit'.✓ 복사됨

product-manager-skill + notion

Store PRDs and discovery notes in a structured Notion database

Save this PRD to the Product > Specs Notion database with the right properties.✓ 복사됨

도구

이 MCP가 노출하는 것

도구	입력	언제 호출
Component skills (21)	feature / product context	You need a specific deliverable
Interactive skills (20)	PM decision / question	You're not sure which framework applies
Workflow skills (6)	multi-week goal	Running a real team process, not a one-off
Leadership readiness coaching	role transition question	Career planning / promotion prep

비용 및 제한

운영 비용

API 쿼터: None
호출당 토큰: 2-8k per skill load
금액: Free — skills are local files
팁: Pick one skill per task; don't try to load the whole library.

보안

권한, 시크릿, 파급범위

자격 증명 저장: No credentials — skill is prompts

데이터 외부 송신: None

문제 해결

자주 발생하는 오류와 해결

Interactive skill feels over-engineered for a simple task

Use the component skill (deliverable-focused) instead of the interactive one.

Output too generic — lacks product specifics

Paste in actual customer quotes, competitive context, or past retros to ground the work.

대안