freemcplab / 目录 / 演练场 / Harness (Meta-skill)

● 社区 revfactory ⚡ 即开即用

Harness (Meta-skill)

Name: Harness (Meta-skill) (Claude Skill)
Author: revfactory

A meta-skill: tell it your domain, it designs the agent team for you (roles, prompts, hand-offs) and saves the specs for reuse.

Harness treats agent design as a first-class workflow: you describe your domain (incident response, content review, code triage); it asks the right questions, then emits a documented team — roles, system prompts, when each takes over, and shared memory boundaries.

▶ 观看演示 📦 安装 💡 使用场景

为什么要用

核心特性

Interview-driven team design
Outputs role specs as Markdown
Defines hand-off rules between agents
Specifies shared vs private memory
Versioned team definitions
Reuse across projects

实时演示

实际使用效果

就绪

安装

作者仓库 · Claude Skills 官方文档

使用场景

实战用法： Harness (Meta-skill)

Design an incident-response agent team

👤 Claude Code users ⏱ ~15 min intermediate

何时使用： You want multiple agents (triage, comms, scribe) cooperating on real incidents instead of one big system prompt.

步骤

Brief

Tell harness: "incident response, B2B SaaS, 3 specialists please."✓ 已复制

→ Harness asks scope questions
Answer

Define escalation, channels, scribe duties.✓ 已复制

→ Spec drafts emerge
Save

Save specs into /agents/incident/.✓ 已复制

→ Reusable team def written

结果： Documented multi-agent team you can rerun next incident, not a one-off prompt.

组合

与其他 MCP 搭配，撬动十倍杠杆

harness-skill + filesystem

Save designed teams alongside your project

Combine harness-skill with filesystem: Save designed teams alongside your project✓ 已复制

工具

此 MCP 暴露的能力

工具	输入参数	何时调用	成本
design	(see docs)	Run the design interview	1 call
review	(see docs)	Critique an existing team for missing roles or unclear hand-offs	1 call

成本与限制

运行它的成本

API 配额: N/A
每次调用 Token 数: Interview is moderate
费用: Free skill
提示: Reuse outputs as-is for next domain; don't redesign from scratch

安全

权限、密钥、影响范围

最小权限： fs-read fs-write

凭据存储： None

数据出站： None

故障排查

常见错误与修复

Output too generic

Provide concrete examples (real past incidents) during the interview

替代方案